Purpose

This is a prospective observational study that will collect outcome data for patients who choose to undergo transoral tongue base operations for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS)as part of their standard of care treatment. This is a data collection study only and does not provide for evaluations or treatment of OSAHS.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Any patient with documented OSAHS who is scheduled for tongue base resection at UAB 2. Age > 18 3. Patients must sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Psychological condition that renders the patient unable to understand the informed consent 2. Any situation or condition that will interfere with adherence to study activities

Study Design

Phase
Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case-Only
Time Perspective
Prospective

More Details

Status
Terminated
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Contact

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a major public health problem, and studies suggest that the incidence of OSAHS may be even higher than estimated. Transoral base of tongue resections are commonly preformed to improve symptoms in OSAHS, but among surgeons there is not yet consensus as to the best tongue base operation. The difficulty in treating the tongue base is illustrated by the abundance of available procedures - including genioglossus advancement, hyoid advancement, tongue base suspension, radiofrequency treatment, transoral midline glossesctomy, submucosal coblation-assisted tongue base resection and recently; transoral robotic-assisted surgery (TORS) for base of tongue (BOT) resection. We will evaluate TORS BOT resection for use in OSAHS by assessing pre- and post-operative OSAHS scores and comparing them to historical data for alternative BOT operations. Though routine, BOT resection may result in significant post-operative pain leading to dysphagia. In certain patients, major complications such as aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition and dehydration can occur as a result. Thus, reducing post-operative dysphagia is critical to improving patient outcomes and limiting complication-associated hospital admissions. Several studies have addressed the management of post-operative dysphagia, but none have evaluated TORS BOT resections in OSAHS. Additionally, TORS BOT resections for malignant neoplasms have been previously shownto be safe and feasible. An outcome analysis of TORS BOT resections for OSAHS may therefore yield recommendations for reducing patient morbidity and mortality.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.