Purpose

This study will compare two techniques to achieve increase in ridge dimensions as a preparation for dental implants using a resorbable barrier membrane and bone particulate allogenic graft hydrated with saline or a growth factor called Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (rhPDGF).

Conditions

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Between 18 Years and 99 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • English speaking - At least 18 years old - Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School - Able to read and understand informed consent document - Need for implants to replace missing tooth or teeth in at least one quadrant of the mouth. - Insufficient alveolar ridge width for endosseous implant placement defined as 5mm or less as determined by bone sounding and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-English speaking - Less than 18 years old - Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day) - Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing - Patient is a poor compliance risk (i.e., poor oral hygiene, history of alcohol or drug abuse) - Vertical loss of bone at edentulous ridge.

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
The calibrated, trained, masked-examiner (who is unaware of which Group the patient is randomized), will be masked and available during the entire duration of the study.

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Experimental
Allograft particles hydrated with rhPDGF
Allograft particles should be hydrated with GEM21S for 20 minutes prior to grafting. The graft sites will be covered with a resorbable barrier membrane.
  • Biological: Allograft particles hydrated with rhPDGF
    Allograft particles should be hydrated with GEM21S for 20 minutes prior to grafting. The graft sites will be covered with a resorbable barrier membrane.
Active Comparator
Allograft particles hydrated in a conventional way with saline.
Allograft particles should be hydrated with saline for 20 minutes prior to grafting. The graft sites will be covered with a resorbable barrier membrane.
  • Biological: Allograft particles hydrated in a conventional way with saline.
    Allograft particles should be hydrated with saline for 20 minutes prior to grafting. The graft sites will be covered with a resorbable barrier membrane

Recruiting Locations

Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry
Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007
Contact:
Hussein Basma, DDS, MS
205-975-2888
basma86@uab.edu

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Contact

Hussein Basma, DDS, MS
205-934-2888
basma86@uab.edu

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, and examiner-only-masked study. It is designed to clinically compare the use of bone particulate allograft hydrated with rhPDGF vs bone particulate allograft hydrated with saline, for patients who were planned to receive dental implants but presented with deficient bone ridges. This investigation of two techniques to achieve increase in ridge dimensions as a preparation for dental implants using a resorbable barrier membrane and bone particulate allogenic graft hydrated with saline or a growth factor called Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (rhPDGF). In two arms, bone core biopsies will be harvested at time of implant placement 4 months following ridge augmentation grafting. These 2x8mm bone cores will then undergo histological and histomorphometrical analyses to determine qualitative and quantitative healing differences between in both study arms. Clinical measurements are gathered at 2 time points (grating and implant placement) at all defects and will be compared for differences. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) initial scans are conducted immediately following prior to ridge augmentation and second scans obtained prior to implant placement both arms. These types of Cone Beam CT scans as well as conventional dental x-rays are valuable treatment planning tools that are commonly used in modern-day implant dentistry. The scans and the x-ray images are also used to monitor the health of tissues surrounding implants and to make sure that the implant remains securely implanted into the jawbone over time.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.